15 January 2002
From: Kris Cooper firstname.lastname@example.org
Q: I am an artist who has centered my work on the writings of J.R.R. Tolkien. My favorite character has always been Gandalf. I admire your skill as an actor, and I'm amazed by how well you fit the role of Gandalf. How do you feel about the fact that the coming wave of Tolkien art, specifically art containing pictures of Gandalf, will bear your face?
A: Nothing but pride - although it won't really be my face, rather the face that I assumed when playing Gandalf the Grey. Gandalf the White looks a bit different - less than a year to go to find out how different! Meanwhile all luck with your own work.
From: Langford Jordan
Q: My question: All actors (at least the good ones) bring something of themselves to a character and this usually enhances a performance. What feature of your own character do you feel you bring to that of Gandalf? Ps. You were excellent in Jack and Sarah!
A: My answer: Having seen Gandalf on screen I am feeling rapidly removed from him as if he now exists (as of course in the novel he always had) independently of me. Now I have observed him, I realise we both like smoking, the countryside, a good laugh, a mission and a taste for stylish headgear.
PS William in that jolly film was a middle-class misfit of great perceptions - a Gandalf the Grey part-prototype as it turns out.
Q: I just wondered what you thought the main reasons for the success of LOTR were? The book is nearly 50 and still going strong - and at 1100+ pages is not the usual sort of thing that makes a blockbuster. So, in a nutshell, what do you think the attraction is?
A: Is it that it looks like a challenge that is really an adventure story set long long ago, a once-upon-a-time-yet-for-real story. So those who like that sort of thing start to read it and then are pulled in by the discovery that Lord of the Rings is about the times. For us it is about the morality of war, of goodness, of fraternity. Like all classics, it is adopted by each generation. In the '40s and '50s the hobbits would seem like the privates battling Hitler; the '60s took to the fantasy and ideals and sense of fellowship. Perhaps thereafter there was a whiff of "required reading" yet the sales continued steady. Though I bet there is many a bookshelf with an unread LOTR next to Gormengast and The Tales of Narnia.
From: Lee Cash
Q: My question refers to the Balrog. It was a truly amazing scene in the first film and I hunger for more exposure to Durin's Bane. Can you confirm that we will see more of Gandalf's battle with the Balrog: perhaps as a flashback when Gandalf tells the tale of his battle against such a powerful foe?
A: Your question would be better addressed to Peter Jackson who is currently editing and preparing The Two Towers in Wellington, New Zealand. But we have filmed sequences which could be part of a flashback to Gandalf's fate after his fall from the bridge in the Moria Mines.
From: Don Gorman email@example.com
Q: Having been an avid and passionate reader of William Shakespeare for most of my adult life, I find that everything worthwhile is - somehow - influenced by Shakespeare's writings. Now, having just seen the film version of Tolkien, I must admit that throughout the experience echoes of Shakespeare seemed to be everywhere; yet, I cannot place a finger on a specific link between a play and Tolkien's Trilogy. Do you feel that Tolkien was heavily influenced by Shakespeare's language and/or philosophy in a specific way?
A: It is not easy to compare a dramatist and a novelist but Tolkien is more influenced by epic writers (of e.g. Beowulf and The Bible) than by Shakespeare. It can be misleading to extrapolate Shakespeare's own philosophy from that of his multifarious characters and his dense poetical expression is far-removed from Tolkien's prose.
From: Michael Cain firstname.lastname@example.org
Q: As a young, gay, first-time reader back in the 80's, I was tickled by the scene where Gandalf pulls Sam in through the window at Bag End and Sam pleads "please don't turn me into anything - unnatural !". Not meaning to speak for the entire sisterhood, but my partner and I love to find gay inuendo/humour between the lines of movies. Was that a twinkle I saw in your eyes, glancing over at Frodo, as you played out this scene with Sam? Love to know if you've chuckled at this line too?
A: Meaning is in the ear of the listener and until you pointed it out I took Sam's plea to refer to things monstrous rather than to sexuality. More generally I am glad Frodo's affection for Sam is so tactile and central to their relationship in the film.